INEC taxes Prof Ignatius Uduk accused of electoral fraud to clear his name

Ini Billie, Uyo

The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), has asked Professor Ignatius Uduk, who had been accused on three counts bordering on publishing false election results and lying under oath to clear his name immediately.

Prof. Uduk, a Professor of Physical and Health Education at the University of Uyo was the Collation/Returning officer for Essien Udim State Constituency in the 2019 general elections.

Counsel to INEC, Mr Clement Onwuenwunor, who spoke with newsmen after court proceedings on Wednesday at the Akwa Ibom State High Court sitting in Uyo, noted that the defence counsel delayed the proceedings when he filed an application with a different suit number which required a different file.

According to Onwuenwunor, the prosecution has closed its case since January 27, 2022, which gave the defence counsel sufficient time to put up their defence if they have any, but the defence counsel failed in that regard.

“Well, everything defence counsel has case strategy and from what we’ve seen so far, they decided to exhaust the options available to him. After the ruling on the 27th of January, we expected them to come up with a defence if they have any, but unfortunately, we’re seeing some form of filibustering so far.

“Yes, he filed a case but in a different file; not in the substantive case file. So it was filed with a different suit number and a different file. The procedure of the registry is that before the Judge can handle such a file, it must come through the chief judge. So that application frustrated that case from being heard together.

“We have been ready since January. We’ve called five witnesses in this matter with an avalanche of evidence, and documents and then on this side, we’re comfortable with the case we’ve presented and we have been appealing to them that there’s every need to ask for the defence to clear his name.

“As a university professor, there’s a serious need for him to clear his name so we can be done and dusted with this matter and what the constitution states is that those charged with a criminal case are allowed to fair hearing for a period of time. He has had almost five months since we cleared our case.

“It is taking too long to conclude. If they don’t have any defence, we expect that they throw away the towel. It is not compulsory to defend the case. What is necessary is that they are given the opportunity to defend their case and if they don’t want to utilise that opportunity, then we have extra options available to us,” he stated.

The presiding judge, Justice Bassey Nkanang adjourned the case to May 18, 2022.